Advanced Search
You are not logged in. | Login | Register

Log in to TheTandD.com

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Man gets 20 years in DUI

By RICHARD WALKER
T&D Staff WriterSaturday, May 05, 2007

6 comment(s) | Default | Large

Turning to face his family, a Williston man offered a jaunty salute Friday after he was sentenced to 20 years in prison for a drunk driving wreck that killed three members of a Denmark family.

Circuit Court Judge Diane Goodstein sentenced 56-year-old Jimmy R. Taylor to 20 years on each of three counts of felony driving under the influence involving death. The sentences are to run concurrently.

“This sentence is very difficult, it is very difficult because of the measure you took from this very large and extended family,” Goodstein said. “I can only imagine those first moments of agony. I know you don’t think you’re the source of that. But you are the source of that.”

Wearing a blue suit, Taylor remained expressionless as his sentence was issued. Throughout his trial, Taylor refused to accept that he caused the crash that killed three people.

Around 8 p.m. on Oct. 21, 2005, Taylor was traveling west on S.C. Highway 70 when his Chevrolet TrailBlazer veered off the right side of the road near the Bamberg County line.

When Taylor brought his vehicle back onto the road, he crossed the center line into the path of a Ford Escort driven by 41-year-old Madison “Matt” Neeley. His father and stepmother, George Phillip “Phil” Neeley, 74, and Anne Price Neeley, 70, were also in the Escort.

Moments later, a second Chevrolet TrailBlazer driven by a Denmark man slammed into passenger’s side of the Ford, which had come to rest in the middle of the road. No charges were brought in the second collision, as the driver did not initiate the crashes.

All three of the Neeleys were declared dead at the scene.

During his closing argument, First Circuit Solicitor David Pascoe said the three most likely died instantly upon contact with Taylor’s vehicle, saying Anne Neeley “went through that thing (windshield) like a bullet through a wall.”

“With one word you can let the defendant know that he will be held responsible,” Pascoe said. “With one word, you can let him know that the lives of George, Anne and Matt meant something.”

A jury of six men and six women spent two hours in deliberations before returning that word – guilty.

Pascoe said afterward that he was “very pleased with the verdict and with Judge Goodstein’s sentence.”

During the course of the three-day trial, defense attorney Everette Chandler introduced multiple theories as to what transpired that night, including the possibility a flat tire caused the accident.

Pascoe maintained in his closing that the case centered on accountability.

“I am disturbed by Mr. Taylor’s not taking responsibility,” he said. “That borders on malice. That’s just not right, getting on that stand and lying.”

Chip Price, Anne Neeley’s son, told Goodstein he wanted to make sure the court understood the victims were more than bodies in graphic pictures.

“The trial ... it mentioned ’the victims’ and ’the bodies,’” Price said. “I just wanted to mention these were real people.”

After the conclusion of the trial, Price talked about his mother and stepfather. He said they had been married for about three years at the time of the collisions.

The two senior Neeleys met as children and, after having gone their separate ways for much of their lives, met again at a flower show in Ladson about 10 years ago. From that point on, they began reacquainting themselves with each other until they married in 2002.

Prior to Taylor’s sentencing, Phyllis Neeley Parker, George Neeley’s daughter, asked the court for “a fair sentence” for Taylor.

The Williston man was facing a maximum of 25 years and a $25,000 fine on each of the three counts.

He will serve 85 percent of his sentence before he is eligible for parole.

“It is my hope that this will close this chapter. For all of you,” Goodstein said to the Neeley-Price families. “I can tell you that the only thing that will make this better is time.”

T&D Staff Writer Richard Walker can be reached by e-mail at rwalker@timesanddemocrat.com or by telephone at 803-533-5516. Discuss this and other stories on-line at TheTandD.com.

 
6 comment(s)
The following comments are reader submitted. They do not represent the views of The T&D or Lee Enterprises.

ebrown wrote on May 26, 2007 10:22 PM:

" This is truly a tragedy for all, especially the Neelys. But it does not make it better to convict a person after 2 hours of deliberation on such evidence. I heard testimony like "most likely". You ruin another family with weak unsure words like that. Justice "more than likely" has not been done here. Horrible accidents happen, we must not seek "so called" justice at all and any cost...to say what? Today one horrible tragedy has turned into two! "

firefighter wrote on May 11, 2007 12:30 AM:

" He wasnt wrongfully charged. His blood alchohol level was .12 and he hit and killed those people. And to top it off, he is such a coward that he isnt man enough to admit it. "

WRITER-7200 wrote on May 9, 2007 7:52 AM:

" Okay, so the trial is over. You have wrongfully charged one man. But because the second man is a friend of the Neeley family, any wrong doing by him is swept under the rug. It was already stated how the second trailblazer is the one that caused the deaths of the Neeley family. It is so easy to place the blame on the other man just so the friend of the family won't go to jail. Yes, Mr. Taylor did have a few drinks. Well why wasn't the second driver given a test? How can he be treated like he did nothing wrong? How is it that he thought he saw something in the raod and did not slow down to make sure it wasn't? Anybody with common sense would know that he had to be going pretty fast, because it was stated how the second driver had to veer off in the feild a good ways and his cruise control was still set. If he would have slowed down, his cruise control would have released. It is too many wholes in this case and justice was definitely NOT served. You see, they look out for there own kind. This case is far from being over......GOD IS WATCHING....... "

Bill Gordon wrote on May 8, 2007 12:46 PM:

" This is a tragic event for all. "

were you there wrote on May 8, 2007 12:04 AM:

" that's a question. if you're telling the truth, then why lie? No autopsies done why? is it the law to do so? nobody asked to do a blood test or nobody given a blood test but the black man. He wasn't under arrest nor was he in custody, but he volunteered to give a blood test. An autopsy would of told you who died when, why wasn't one done? taking an tox on everybody would of made sure that everybody or nobody was under the influence. why one wasn't done on everybody? and lastly nobody wearing a seatbelt but the one they said was drunk, that don't sound right. somebody out there knows the truth, please tell it a man's life depend on it. "

Ms Charelston County wrote on May 7, 2007 12:06 PM:

" Was this a just trial?? I think not. Blame is so easy to pass. There were only five persons present at the scene that October night and there are only two able to provide those details. One of whom is not even being questioned. Two cars were involved and two cars should be at fault. It is unjust to place the blame on one person. Lets be adults and take responsibilty. Everyone is at a lost at this point. Lets be fair and over-turn this ruling. There are too many pot holes in this trial leaving too much room for interpretation. "



» Post a comment Thanks for your comment! Once approved, your comment will appear on the site.

You must be logged in to comment.

Click Here To Sign in

Click here to get an account
it's free and quick
Please note: The Times and Democrat provides our story commenting feature in order to solicit feedback, debate and discussion on topics of local interest. Please keep in mind that civility is a necessary component of productive conversation. All blatantly inflammatory or otherwise inappropriate comments (i.e. vulgarity, marketing, etc.) are subject to rejection and/or removal. Comments will appear if and when they are approved. Thanks for reading, and thanks for participating.

More News